June 12, 2007

     Volume 2007, No. 5

This free electronic newsletter for nutrition and health professional subscribers is brought to you by The Beef Checkoff through the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association. See the end of the newsletter for communication and subscription information.

Please visit our Web site at http://www.beefnutrition.org/ for information and education materials about nutrition and health.

IN THIS EDITION

LEVELS OF HUNGER AND DESIRE TO EAT ARE LOWER FOR MEN CONSUMING HIGHER PROTEIN DIETS

CAN WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE MEASUREMENT IMPROVE IDENTIFICATION OF PATIENTS WITH HIGH CARDIOMETABOLIC RISK?

FREE NUTRITION EDUCATION KIT FOR 4TH AND 5TH GRADES DESIGNED TO FACILITATE TEACHER/DIETITIAN COLLABORATION IN THE CLASSROOM


LEVELS OF HUNGER AND DESIRE TO EAT ARE LOWER FOR MEN CONSUMING HIGHER PROTEIN DIETS

Numerous studies have shown that subjects consuming higher protein preloads compared to lower protein preloads consumed a mean 9% less energy intake at a subsequent meal. These findings are used to support protein's higher satiating qualities as well as the theory that a person's habitual protein intake might affect appetite and thus eating behaviors. However, very limited studies have actually assessed how habitual protein intake influences appetite. In addition, an understanding of the influence of habitual inadequate protein intake on appetite is critical since 15-40% of older Americans may be consuming protein at or below the recommended dietary allowance (RDA).

A study published in The Journal of Nutrition examined the effects of protein intakes at various levels of adequacy on indices of appetite in twelve younger (21-43 years) and ten older (63-79 years) men. The study consisted of three 18-day trials using individualized, isoenergetic menus, with each trial providing either 1.00, 0.75, and 0.50 grams of protein/kg body weight/day. These three levels of protein intake were equivalent to 125%, 94%, and 63% or the RDA. Total energy, carbohydrate and fat intakes were equal among the three trials.

Study results showed that, regardless of age, hunger and desire to eat were higher among those consuming 63% and 94% of the RDA than those consuming 125% of the RDA. Even though there were relatively small differences in actual protein intake, these results show that the appetite response is clearly detectable in both older and younger men.

 

 

 

Citation:

Inadequate Dietary Protein Increases Hunger and Desire to Eat in Younger and Older Men. Apolzan  JW, Carnell NS, Mattes RD, Campbell WW. The Journal of Nutrition, 2007;Jun;137(6):1478-82.

To read the abstract, go to Inadequate Dietary Protein Increases Hunger and Desire to Eat in Younger and Older Men.

CAN WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE MEASUREMENT IMPROVE IDENTIFICATION OF PATIENTS WITH HIGH CARDIOMETABOLIC RISK?

An expert panel was convened by Shaping America's Health: Association for Weight Management and Obesity Prevention; NAASO, The Obesity Society; the American Society for Nutrition; and the American Diabetes Association in December 2006 to address four questions dealing with waist circumference (WC) and cardiometabolic risk. 

  1. What does WC measure?

  2. What are the biological mechanisms responsible for the association between WC and cardiometabolic risk?

  3. What is the power of WC to predict adverse cardiometabolic outcomes? How does the predictive power of WC compare with that of BMI? Does measuring WC in addition to BMI improve predictability?

  4. Should WC be measured in clinical practice?

BMI provides information about body volume and mass, while WC assesses body shape.  Generally, they are correlated but WC provides a better measure of fat distribution, specifically intraabdominal adipose tissue.  Recently, it has been suggested that increased WC may indicate an impaired energy storage system which results in increased intraabdominal adipose tissue. Data indicate that WC can identify persons at greater cardiometabolic risk than those identified by BMI alone. Results from weight-loss and exercise training trials show that reductions in WC coincide with reductions in obesity-related cardiometabolic risk factors and disease.

Since WC measurement would increase patient assessment time, the panel concluded it should only be done if it provides additional information that affects patient management.  NHANES III data indicate that 99.9% of men and 98.49% of women would have received identical treatment if WC assessment had been added to an evaluation of BMI and other cardiovascular risk factors.  However, an analysis of NHANES III and Canadian Heart Health Surveys data found that BMI-specific WC cutpoints provided a better indicator of risk than did the recommended WC standards.  Measurement of WC would be more informative if the WC cutpoints were BMI-related.  As a result, the real value of WC assessment might be in identifying "metabolically obese, lean" patients who would otherwise not be considered for treatment because of a normal BMI.  WC could also identify "metabolically normal, obese" patients who would not require treatment despite an elevated BMI because they did not have increased cardiometabolic risk.

Citation:

Waist circumference and cardiometabolic risk: a consensus statement from Shaping America's Health: Association for Weight Management and Obesity Prevention; NAASO, The Obesity Society; the American Society for Nutrition; and the American Diabetes Association. Klein S, Allison DB, Heymsfield SB, Kelley DE, Leibel RL, Nonas C, Kahn R. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2007 May;85(5):1197-202.

To read the full text, go to Waist circumference and cardiometabolic risk: a consensus statement from Shaping America's Health: Association for Weight Management and Obesity Prevention; NAASO, The Obesity Society; the American Society for Nutrition; and the American Diabetes Association.  No abstract available.

FREE NUTRITION EDUCATION KIT FOR 4TH AND 5TH GRADES DESIGNED TO FACILITATE TEACHER/DIETITIAN COLLABORATION IN THE CLASSROOM

Choose Well is a 4th-5th grade math and nutrition curriculum that delivers important messages about how to choose nutrient-rich foods in appropriate portion sizes.  The kit includes the following components:

  • Eight classroom activities covering the five food groups, nutrition facts labels and how to understand appropriate portion sizes

  • A teacher backgrounder
  • A large poster identifying the five food groups, the nutrients found in each and the appropriate portions from each
  • A MyPyramid for Kids poster
  • A video, Food!, with a music component teaching how to “choose well”
  • An action computer game, teaching how to balance calories with the appropriate number of servings from each food group
  • Two handouts for parents with messages from the teacher explaining what children are learning in the Choose Well curriculum and fun, family recipes

With the current mandate to focus on core curricula in schools, many classroom teachers are struggling with the challenges of teaching nutrition and healthy lifestyles to their students.  Choose Well is designed to maximize opportunities for making RDs a valued resource to schools.  Any or all of the eight activities can be taught or enhanced by RDs.  This RD/teacher collaboration provides the opportunity for RDs to become school wellness resources on the variety of nutrition issues facing schools.

To order a free Choose Well kit, e-mail School Wellness, put Choose Well in the subject line, and provide your name and UPS shipping information.

NEWSLETTER TOOLS

Do you have any comments or suggestions? Send an e-mail to umaileditor@beef.org.

©  Cattlemen's Beef Board and the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association.
     All rights reserved.

      Brought to you by The Beef Checkoff